.270 vs .308: Is a Bigger Caliber Actually Better?

The .270 Winchester and .308 Winchester have more in common than meets the eye. Tyler Freel

We may earn revenue from the products available on this page and participate in affiliate programs. Learn More

At first-glance, it doesn’t make a ton of sense comparing the .270 vs .308. They are, after all, different calibers with different parent cases. However they are both classic big-game cartridges, many modern rifles still come chambered in each, and both are known for their manageable recoil. Plus, hunters and shooters love comparing cartridges whether it makes sense or not, so, here we go. 

This cartridge debate of the .270 Winchester vs .308 Winchester is not to determine a victor. That’d be like choosing which grandpa is your favorite. Rather, we’ll focus on the facts and address the cartridges’ strengths and weaknesses. Put very simply, the .270 shoots lighter bullets, delivers flatter trajectories, and brings more energy down range. The .308 is capable of shooting a wider variety of bullet weights (including bullets heavier than the .270 offers).

.270 Winchester Specs

Bullet Diameter: .277 inches

Case Length: 2.540 inches 

Overall Length: 3.340 inches

Parent Case:  .30/06 Springfield

.308 Winchester Specs

Bullet Diameter: .308 inches

Case Length: 2.015 inches 

Overall Length: 2.8 inches

Parent Case: .300 Savage

Depending on your hunting style and shooting interests, one of these cartridges might make more sense than the other. However, rest assured, both of these cartridges in the hands of a skilled shooter are capable of taking down almost all of the big-game in North America and beyond.


The .308 (top) offers a wider variety of heavy bullets. The .270 (bottom) offers a flatter trajectory and a slightly more down-range energy. Tyler Freel

.270 Winchester 

Following the success of the .30/06 Springfield in the early 1900’s, riflemen continued tinkering with the .30/06 case, necking it up or down, and a variety of wildcat cartridges emerged. Winchester engineers began tinkering too, necking down the .30/06 case to accommodate a .277 caliber projectile, and the .270 Winchester cartridge was born. Winchester officially released the .270 Win. in 1925 with an advertised muzzle velocity just north of 3,100 fps shooting a 130-grain bullet.

Jack O’Connor is largely responsible for the success of the .270 Winchester.

The .270 Winchester was not immediately a beloved cartridge like some of the other cartridges developed during the early 1900s but it slowly and surely gained favor in the eyes of sportsmen and women over the course of the next several decades. Much of its success is owed to the legendary hunter and late Outdoor Life Shooting Editor, Jack O’Connor. He used the .270 Win. as his cartridge of choice on hunting excursions all around the world, sharing his stories with OL readers. 

After years of hunting with and advocating for the .270, O’Connor wrote this in a 1954 OL column (note, this was published well after the .308 was introduced) : “At the time it was introduced in 1925, the .270 was the flattest-shooting standard big-game cartridge in the world. With the 130-gr. bullet, which has killed very dead all sorts of large and ponderous animals, it still is. With the 100-gr. bullet in the factory loading, which is designed for varmints·, the .270 has a trajectory almost as flat as that of the .220 Swift. Because of this flat trajectory, high velocity, good accuracy, and mild recoil, the .270 is the easiest standard cartridge to make well-placed hits on game with, at long and uncertain ranges, that I have ever used.” 

Fast forward about 100 years since its inception and the .270 Win. continues to carry on its legacy as a revered big-game hunting cartridge.

.308 Winchester

Then-shooting editor Jack O’Connor with what he considered a good deer rig: a .308 Winchester Model 100 topped with a “Leupold variable-power scope.” Outdoor Life

The 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge was developed in the 1950s and adopted into military service shortly after. It made a splash, producing nearly similar ballistics to the .30/06 Springfield, but in a short-action configuration (SNOW NOTE: please add info somewhere about the .308’s short action length allowing for smaller and lighter rifle actions, and for those doing custom build being able to use a short-action platform is an advantage). In 1952, Winchester launched the .308 Winchester cartridge, which is the twin brother of the 7.62×51 NATO with two minor differences. The .308 Win. ammunition is loaded to a higher pressure than the 7.62×51 NATO ammo and the wall thickness of .308 Win. brass is slightly thinner to accommodate the increase in pressure. Rifles chambered in .308 Win can safely shoot 7.62×51 ammunition. However, rifles chambered in 7.62×51 should not be fired .308 Win. ammunition. The .308’s parent case is the .300 Savage (not the .30/06 as some folks believe). 

With plenty of performance packed into a short-action format, the .308 Win. was quickly adopted by hunters and shooters across the country as an extremely versatile, accurate, and capable cartridge. The virtue of it being a short-action offering, rather than the standard/long action that a .270 requires, is that .308 rifles can be lighter and handier.

Since its launch, the .308 Win. has become one of the most popular cartridges on the market with nearly every firearms manufacturer still producing flagship rifles chambered in .308.


Comparing the ballistics between the .270 Win. and .308 Win. is a bit challenging given the difference in bullet diameters (.277 vs .308). However, this cartridge comparison serves as a good example of bullet speed vs. bullet weight. 

150-Grain Nosler Partition

For the first comparison, I pulled ballistics from two similarly weighted projectiles. Keep in mind that a 150-grain projectile is pushing the top end of bullet weight for the .270 Win., while a 150-grain bullet is the middle of the pack for .308 Win. 

.270 Winchester

Muzzle Velocity: 2,830 fps

Energy @300 yds: 1,709 ft-lb 

Drop @300 yds: 12.8 inches

.308 Winchester

Muzzle Velocity: 2,840 fps

Energy @300 yds: 1,565 ft-lb

Drop @300 yds: 13.4 inches

The .270 (left) vs the .308 (right). Outdoor Life

As you can see the loads are nearly identical coming out of the muzzle. However as distance increases the .270 begins to pull away with its sleeker bullet retaining more velocity. 

Heavier Bullets vs Lighter bullets

Now let’s look at another example with a drastic variation in bullet weight. Hornady’s ELD-X bullet, loaded in their Precision Hunter line is offered in 178 grains in .308 and 145 grains in .270.

.270 Win., 145 grains

Muzzle Velocity: 2,970 fps

Energy @300 yds: 1,955 ft-lb

Drop @300 yds: 6.5 inches

.308 Win, 178 grains

Muzzle Velocity: 2,600 fps

Energy @300 yds: 1,792 ft-lb

Drop @300 yds:  8.8 inches

The 145-grain .270 bullet (left) vs 178-grain .308 bullet (right). Outdoor Life

It might surprise some .308 fans to see that the lighter .270 bullet carries more energy down range because of its higher velocity than the heavier .308 bullet (even out to 500 yards). 

Truth be told, ballistically, the two cartridges are pretty evenly matched. Would you rather have the option to shoot a variety of larger bullets (choose the .308) or do you prefer a faster, flatter trajectory with a slight increase in down-range energy at typical hunting distances (choose the .270). 

READ NEXT: .270 Winchester vs 6.5 Creedmoor


Both of these cartridges were designed to reduce felt recoil compared to the .30/06 Springfield. There are many variables that go into determining the felt recoil of a cartridge including the bullet weight, powder charge, weight of your rifle, and the use of a suppressor or muzzle brake. However, all things being equal, the kick of the two cartridges is similar with average felt recoil hovering around 20 foot-pounds in a 7-pound rifle. For comparison, the average felt recoil from a 6.5 Creedmoor is around 12 foot-pounds, while the recoil from a .300 Win. Mag. is up about 27 to 29 foot-pounds. 

Neither the .270 Win. or the .308 Win. will knock you off your feet, but there are lighter-recoiling big-game cartridges out there.


Both the .270 Win. and .308 Win., in the hands of a capable shooter, can and will produce noteworthy accuracy results. It often takes some experimenting and trial and error with different loads, but given the right load and rifle combination, it is not uncommon for both of these cartridges to produce sub-MOA groups. Thanks to modern manufacturing processes, factory rifles and ammunition for these two cartridges are being built to extremely tight tolerances resulting in impressive, out-of-the box accuracy for hunters.

Terminal Performance

The author took this kudu with a .270 Winchester. Colton Heward

With similar ballistic performance, no animal will be able to tell the difference between the impact from a .270 Win. vs. .308 Win. 

Some might scoff at the .270 Win., brushing it aside as an ideal deer and pronghorn rifle, but not capable of taking bigger game like elk or moose. They are only half wrong. Yes, it is a fantastic cartridge for mid-sized game. However, given proper bullet selection and shot placement, the .270 Win. is more than capable of taking down the biggest ungulates with authority, including the giant yukon moose of the North. Just ask Mr. O’Connor, or OL’s Tyler Freel who recently included it in his roundup of the best moose cartridges

Several years ago, the .270 Win. was my cartridge of choice on a safari in Southern Africa. Shooting 130-grain Nosler E-Tip bullets, I successfully hunted southern-greater kudu, zebra, and black wildebeest. All three animals quickly succumbed to the bullet and cartridge combination with the kudu (an elk-sized animal) dropping in his tracks.

The .308 Win. has proven itself over many decades in the field as a very competent and deadly cartridge on everything from dainty pronghorn on up to massive rut-crazed bull elk and moose. No matter your cartridge of choice, your bullet selection is of the utmost importance, especially when hunting elk-sized game and bigger. Generally speaking, heavier bonded bullets are a wise choice for the bigger game. 

READ NEXT: 6.5 Creedmoor vs .308 Winchester

Ammunition Availability and Selection

Even through the ammunition shortage over the past several years, shooters could typically find both .308 Win. and .270 Win. ammunition. The same could not be said for many other cartridges. Thankfully, ammo has become much more abundant on store shelves this year with a variety of valuable options to choose from for both these (and other) cartridges. 

The most common bullet weights for the .270 Win. are 130- and 150-grain projectiles and nearly every major ammo manufacturer produces multiple options. The cost of a box of shells varies based on brand and bullet type, costing anywhere between $25 and $65. Guns.com currently has 15 different ammunition options in stock for the .270 Win. in a wide range of bullet configurations.

Similarly, the .308 Win has a plethora of ammunition options currently available. One advantage that the .308 Win. does have over the .270 Win. is a wider range of bullet weight options. Bullets weights for hunting purposes vary from Nosler’s 110-grain Varmageddon load all the way up to Winchester’s 185-grain Super-X Powerpoint. It is worth noting that there is factory ammunition loaded for the .308 Win. that goes all the way up to 260-grains, but the majority of them are intended for target use. 

The cost of .308 Win. ammunition varies between $25 and $70 per box. However, the average cost seems to hover around $35 to  $40. The .270 Win. ammunition is usually readily available, but the options for available ammo for the .308 Win. more than triple the .270 Win. Guns.com currently shows about 100 different ammunition SKUs in stock for the .308 Win.

READ NEXT: Best .308 Hunting Ammo

Final Thoughts on .270 vs .308 

Both the .270 and .308 are capable of taking big game in North America—and Africa. Colton Heward

I’ll probably offend both of these classic cartridges’ loyal fan bases by saying this, but, the battle between the .270 Win. and .308 Win. in my eyes is a wash. Yes, the .270 Win. does shoot faster and flatter, and in some cases, does generate slightly greater downrange energy than the .308 Win. In Mr. O’Connor’s day, before laser rangefinders and exposed adjustable riflescope turrets, a flat-shooting rifle was a real benefit. Today, rangefinding a target and dialing for elevation is a very attainable skill for big-game hunters. 

Yes, the .308 Win. is capable of shooting a wider range of bullet weights and certainly has many more ammunition options readily available than the .270 Win. But for most big-game hunters, 145-grain to 180-grain bullets is all we’ll ever need. So choose whichever cartridge fits your style and taste. Or, even better, buy a few different rifles chambered in each. 
Several flashy new cartridges have flooded the market in recent years that, like it or not, are ballistically superior to both of these options. With that said, teaching an old dog new tricks is an arduous task and gun owners are no different. The near cult following of these two classic cartridges refuses to let them slip by the wayside. Both the .270 Win. and .308 Win. will continue to be among the most popular cartridges in North America for many years to come.

The post .270 vs .308: Is a Bigger Caliber Actually Better? appeared first on Outdoor Life.

Articles may contain affiliate links which enable us to share in the revenue of any purchases made.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Generated by Feedzy